Danish Official Explains Why He Told Trump to ‘F*** Off’
A Danish lawmaker explained why he told President Trump to “F*** Off” in response to Trump’s desire to purchase Greenland. In his statement, the Danish official made it clear: Greenland has been part of Denmark for over 800 years and is not for sale. The lawmaker’s blunt response, as the Danish Official Explains Why He Told Trump to ‘F** Off’*, was made to defend Denmark’s sovereignty after Trump’s controversial remarks, which were seen as an affront to both Denmark and Greenland.
He further criticized the Danish government for not taking a stronger stance against Trump’s comments, expressing frustration over their lack of action. Despite the European Parliament’s disapproval of his language, he stood by his words, emphasizing the importance of defending national sovereignty. The lawmaker made it clear that strong language was necessary to protect the rights of Denmark and Greenland.
The Reason for Blunt Language
The lawmaker explained his use of blunt language. First, he saw Trump’s remarks as an unacceptable attack on Danish sovereignty. Greenland has been part of Denmark for centuries. Second, he criticized the Danish government for not taking a firmer stance. He felt the country’s leadership needed to stand up to Trump’s claims.
The Issue of Sovereignty and Borders
The lawmaker emphasized that Greenland’s relationship with Denmark predates the United States. He stressed that respecting borders and sovereignty is vital. Trump’s attempt to claim Greenland was seen as undermining both Denmark and Greenland’s independence.
Response from the European Parliament
The European Parliament did not agree with the lawmaker’s language. The Vice President condemned his words, stating they weren’t appropriate in a democratic setting. However, the lawmaker stood by his choice, pointing out that the Parliament allows strong language against others but not against Trump.
No Regrets: Standing by His Words
Despite criticism, the lawmaker had no regrets. He expressed frustration with the European Parliament’s selective rules. If anyone had a problem with his words, they could take it up with him. He had not heard from the President of Parliament since his speech, suggesting that the matter was over.
Trump’s Position on Greenland
President Trump has continued to claim that Denmark and Greenland will eventually agree to a deal. He argued that Greenland’s value for international security will make Denmark reconsider.
The Lawmaker’s Counterarguments
The lawmaker disagreed with Trump’s view. He pointed out that the U.S. military has been in Greenland since 1941. Security concerns have already been addressed. Greenland’s sovereignty is uncontested, and Denmark has always supported U.S. interests in the region.
Historical Precedents: The U.S. Virgin Islands
The lawmaker also reminded Trump of the historical sale of the U.S. Virgin Islands. He noted that residents of the islands don’t have voting rights in U.S. elections. This, he argued, shows how the U.S. handles its territories and suggested that Greenland would face similar treatment.
The Greenlandic Perspective: Full Rights with Denmark
The lawmaker highlighted that Greenlanders have full voting rights in Denmark, even having more representation in Parliament than some Danish citizens. In contrast, U.S. territories lack such rights. He argued that Greenland’s people would fare better staying within Denmark.
Conclusion: A Firm Stance on Sovereignty
The Danish lawmaker firmly rejected Trump’s claim to Greenland. In his explanation, the Danish official made it clear that the people of Greenland should decide their future, not outside powers. By saying “Danish Official Explains Why He Told Trump to ‘F*** Off’,” he stood by his strong words, emphasizing that Denmark and Greenland’s sovereignty must be respected. His message was direct and unapologetic, highlighting the importance of protecting the rights and independence of Greenland and Denmark.
For more information or if you have any questions, feel free to Contact Us.